Message-ID: <CAFLszTjwhy24UiT6kUJABMC1Xn0h9Q1q9fYpZZJg9DX8Vss9cA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 06:14:00 -0700
From: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>, 
	U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@...ts.denx.de>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	workflows@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree

Hi Masahiro, Tom,

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 07:33, Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:01:42PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:47 AM Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Masahiro,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 5:14 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 08:54:42PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > Add a script which produces a Flat Image Tree (FIT), a single file
> > > > > containing the built kernel and associated devicetree files.
> > > > > Compression defaults to gzip which gives a good balance of size and
> > > > > performance.
> > > > >
> > > > > The files compress from about 86MB to 24MB using this approach.
> > > > >
> > > > > The FIT can be used by bootloaders which support it, such as U-Boot
> > > > > and Linuxboot. It permits automatic selection of the correct
> > > > > devicetree, matching the compatible string of the running board with
> > > > > the closest compatible string in the FIT. There is no need for
> > > > > filenames or other workarounds.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a 'make image.fit' build target for arm64, as well. Use
> > > > > FIT_COMPRESSION to select a different algorithm.
> > > > >
> > > > > The FIT can be examined using 'dumpimage -l'.
> > > > >
> > > > > This features requires pylibfdt (use 'pip install libfdt'). It also
> > > > > requires compression utilities for the algorithm being used. Supported
> > > > > compression options are the same as the Image.xxx files. For now there
> > > > > is no way to change the compression other than by editing the rule for
> > > > > $(obj)/image.fit
> > > > >
> > > > > While FIT supports a ramdisk / initrd, no attempt is made to support
> > > > > this here, since it must be built separately from the Linux build.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v9:
> > > > > - Move the compression control into Makefile.lib
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v8:
> > > > > - Drop compatible string in FDT node
> > > > > - Correct sorting of MAINTAINERS to before ARM64 PORT
> > > > > - Turn compress part of the make_fit.py comment in to a sentence
> > > > > - Add two blank lines before parse_args() and setup_fit()
> > > > > - Use 'image.fit: dtbs' instead of BUILD_DTBS var
> > > > > - Use '$(<D)/dts' instead of '$(dir $<)dts'
> > > > > - Add 'mkimage' details Documentation/process/changes.rst
> > > > > - Allow changing the compression used
> > > > > - Tweak cover letter since there is only one clean-up patch
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v7:
> > > > > - Add Image as a dependency of image.fit
> > > > > - Drop kbuild tag
> > > > > - Add dependency on dtbs
> > > > > - Drop unnecessary path separator for dtbs
> > > > > - Rebase to -next
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v5:
> > > > > - Drop patch previously applied
> > > > > - Correct compression rule which was broken in v4
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > > - Use single quotes for UIMAGE_NAME
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > > - Drop temporary file image.itk
> > > > > - Drop patch 'Use double quotes for image name'
> > > > > - Drop double quotes in use of UIMAGE_NAME
> > > > > - Drop unnecessary CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT condition for help
> > > > > - Avoid hard-coding "arm64" for the DT architecture
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > - Drop patch previously applied
> > > > > - Add .gitignore file
> > > > > - Move fit rule to Makefile.lib using an intermediate file
> > > > > - Drop dependency on CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT
> > > > > - Pick up .dtb files separately from the kernel
> > > > > - Correct pylint too-many-args warning for write_kernel()
> > > > > - Include the kernel image in the file count
> > > > > - Add a pointer to the FIT spec and mention of its wide industry usage
> > > > > - Mention the kernel version in the FIT description
> > > > >
> > > > >  Documentation/process/changes.rst |   9 +
> > > > >  MAINTAINERS                       |   7 +
> > > > >  arch/arm64/Makefile               |   7 +-
> > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/.gitignore        |   1 +
> > > > >  arch/arm64/boot/Makefile          |   6 +-
> > > > >  scripts/Makefile.lib              |  16 ++
> > > > >  scripts/make_fit.py               | 291 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  7 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >  create mode 100755 scripts/make_fit.py
> > > >
> > > > I'll need Masahiro's Ack on the scripts/ changes before I can take this
> > > > one.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on this request, please?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Simon
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > As I mentioned before, I am concerned with having
> > the same "compatible" entries, with different contents,
> > as you use the "compatible" string as an ID to selecting
> > the target config node, right?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > $ fdtdump  arch/arm64/boot/image.fit
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         conf-10 {
> >             compatible = "tq,am642-tqma6442l-mbax4xxl",
> > "tq,am642-tqma6442l", "ti,am642";
> >             description = "TQ-Systems TQMa64xxL SoM on MBax4xxL carrier board";
> >             fdt = "fdt-10";
> >             kernel = "kernel";
> >         };
> >
> >         ...
> >
> >         conf-25 {
> >             compatible = "tq,am642-tqma6442l-mbax4xxl",
> > "tq,am642-tqma6442l", "ti,am642";
> >             description = "TQ-Systems TQMa64xxL SoM on MBax4xxL carrier board";
> >             fdt = "fdt-25";
> >             kernel = "kernel";
> >         };
>
> I had asked Rob a while ago about if having the same compatible for two
> functionally different machines is a feature, or a bug, and I don't
> think either of us fully agreed either way. I'd be leaning towards
> saying the above example is a bug in the dts files, it's just not been a
> bug people have worried about before due to (sadly) how little the
> top-level compatible has been used.

Yes I believe this is a bug in the files.

What should the script do in this case? Print a warning, perhaps?

Regards,
Simon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists