| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3fc2f75e-d163-1ad1-009a-0e4538011885@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:00 +0800
From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: Huang Pei <huangpei@...ngson.cn>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>, Li Xuefeng <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Yang Tiezhu <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, Gao Juxin <gaojuxin@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memblock_reserve for unadded region (was: [PATCH] MIPS:
loongson64: fix boot failure)
On 2024/1/16 20:23, Huang Pei wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:08:21PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>> Hi mm folks,
>>>
>>> Just a quick question, what is the expected behavior of memblock_reserve
>>> a region that is not added to memblock with memblock_add?
>>>
>>> I'm unable to find any documentation about memblock_reserve in comments and
>>> boot-time-mm, but as per my understanding to the code, this should be a
>>> legit usage?
>> Yes, memblock allows reserving memory that was not added to memblock with
>> memblock_add().
> I think arch/platform specific code should fix this bug, like,
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> //for loongson64
> memblock_set_node(0, 1ULL << 44, &memblock.reserved, 0);
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> or maybe memblock provide something like memblock_reserve_node
Hi pei,
Can you test the following patch to see if it fixes this bug?
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 2c19f5515e36..97721d99fdce 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -708,6 +708,9 @@ static void __meminit init_reserved_page(unsigned
long pfn, int nid)
pg_data_t *pgdat;
int zid;
+ if (unlikely(nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES))
+ nid = early_pfn_to_nid(pfn);
+
if (early_page_initialised(pfn, nid))
return;
>>
>>> In practical we run into uninitialized nid of reserved block problem, should
>>> we fix it
>>> in our usage, or on memblock side?
>> Apparently it's a bug in memblock :(
>>
>> If you revert 61167ad5fecd ("mm: pass nid to reserve_bootmem_region()")
>> does the issue disappear?
> Yes, I git bisect this commit.
>
> But I don't think it is a bug in memblock. IMO, memblock_reserve under
> NUMA set nid of reserved region to MAX_NUMNODES, which is the point
> that cause the "memblock_get_region_node from memmap_init_reserved_pages "
> passing a invalid node id(aka MAX_NUMNODES) to "reserver_bootmem_region
> -> init_reserved_page -> early_pfn_to_nid". If arch-specific code DOES NOT
> initialize the nid of reserved region(only it know that), or the reserved
> region NOT within a memblock added by memblock_add, memblock can not
> give a valid node id to the reserved region. Commit 61167ad5fecd ("mm: pass nid to
> reserve_bootmem_region()") just reveals the embarrassment case by an
> out of bound memory access.
>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> 在 2023/12/25 09:30, Huang Pei 写道:
>>>> Since commit 61167ad5fecd("mm: pass nid to reserve_bootmem_region()),
>>>> loongson64 booting failed with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT like
>>>> this:
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Call Trace:
>>>> [<ffffffff8235d088>] reserve_bootmem_region+0xa8/0x184
>>>> [<ffffffff82333940>] memblock_free_all+0x104/0x2a8
>>>> [<ffffffff8231d8e4>] mem_init+0x84/0x94
>>>> [<ffffffff82330958>] mm_core_init+0xf8/0x308
>>>> [<ffffffff82318c38>] start_kernel+0x43c/0x86c
>>>>
>>>> Code: 10400028 2402fff0 de420000 <dc432880> 0203182b 14600022
>>>> 64420070 00003025 24040003
>>>>
>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
>>>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task! ]---
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> The root cause is no memory region "0x0-0x1fffff" paired with
>>>> memory-reserved region "0x0-0x1fffff" and "0x0-0xfff", with "memblock
>>>> =debug":
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> memory[0x0] [0x0000000000200000-0x000000000effffff],
>>>> 0x000000000ee00000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0 !!!!here
>>>> memory[0x1] [0x0000000090000000-0x00000000fdffffff],
>>>> 0x000000006e000000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
>>>> memory[0x2] [0x0000000100000000-0x000000027fffffff],
>>>> 0x0000000180000000 bytes on node 0 flags: 0x0
>>>> memory[0x3] [0x0000100000000000-0x000010000fffffff],
>>>> 0x0000000010000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0
>>>> memory[0x4] [0x0000100090000000-0x000010027fffffff],
>>>> 0x00000001f0000000 bytes on node 1 flags: 0x0
>>>> reserved.cnt = 0x1f
>>>> reserved[0x0] [0x0000000000000000-0x000000000190c80a],
>>>> 0x000000000190c80b bytes flags: 0x0 !!!!oops 0x0-0x1fffff not in memory[0]
>>>> reserved[0x1] [0x000000000190c810-0x000000000190eea3],
>>>> 0x0000000000002694 bytes flags: 0x0
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> It caused memory-reserved region "0x0-0x1fffff" without valid node id
>>>> in "memblock_get_region_node" from "memmap_init_reserved_pages", lead to
>>>> "reserve_bootmem_region-> init_reserved_page -> early_pfn_to_nid()"
>>>> accessing "node_data" out of bound.
>>>>
>>>> To fix this bug, we should remove unnecessary memory block reservation.
>>>>
>>>> +. no need to reserve 0x0-0x1fffff below kernel loading address, since
>>>> it is not registered by "memblock_add_node"
>>>>
>>>> +. no need to reserve 0x0-0xfff for exception handling if it is not
>>>> registered by "memblock_add" either.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: commit 61167ad5fecd("mm: pass nid to reserve_bootmem_region())
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huang Pei <huangpei@...ngson.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 3 ++-
>>>> arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c | 2 --
>>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
>>>> index 246c6a6b0261..9b632b4c10c3 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,8 @@ unsigned long vi_handlers[64];
>>>> void reserve_exception_space(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size)
>>>> {
>>>> - memblock_reserve(addr, size);
>>>> + if(memblock_is_region_memory(addr, size))
>>>> + memblock_reserve(addr, size);
>>>> }
>>>> void __init *set_except_vector(int n, void *addr)
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c b/arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c
>>>> index 8f61e93c0c5b..0f516dde81da 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c
>>>> @@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ static void __init node_mem_init(unsigned int node)
>>>> memblock_reserve((node_addrspace_offset | 0xfe000000),
>>>> 32 << 20);
>>>> - /* Reserve pfn range 0~node[0]->node_start_pfn */
>>>> - memblock_reserve(0, PAGE_SIZE * start_pfn);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> Jiaxun Yang
>>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists