[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8dc46781-9ae9-4bc8-83f9-ef56743b8d01@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:38:46 +0000
From: <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>
To: <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>,
<sam@...nborg.org>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lee@...nel.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Linux4Microchip@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT
schema
On 17/01/24 2:15 am, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 16/01/2024 12:37, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Convert the existing DT binding to DT schema of the Atmel's HLCDC display
>> controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> changelog
>> v1 -> v2
>> - Remove the explicit copyrights.
>> - Modify filename like compatible.
>> - Modify title (drop words like binding/driver).
>> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver.
>> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required.
>> - Ref endpoint and not endpoint-base.
>> - Drop redundant info about bus-width description and add ref to video-interfaces.
>> - Move 'additionalProperties' after 'Required'.
>> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related here.
>> - Add compatible to example 2 and add comments that bus-width is the diff between two examples.
>> ---
>
> Please respond to review comments and acknowledge you implement each of
> them. I don't think you did here everything I pointed out. The next
> patch for sure misses things.
My apologies, I will ensure that I address all the review comments in v3.
--
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists