linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests/resctrl: Split validate_resctrl_feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:48:53 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Maciej Wieczór-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests/resctrl: Split
 validate_resctrl_feature_request()

Hi Maciej,

On 1/17/2024 1:49 AM, Maciej Wieczór-Retman wrote:
> On 2024-01-08 at 14:38:45 -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 12/12/2023 6:52 AM, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:


>>> +
>>> +	snprintf(res_path, sizeof(res_path), "%s/%s/%s", INFO_PATH, resource,
>>> +		 feature);
>>> +
>>> +	if (stat(res_path, &statbuf))
>>> +		return false;
>>
>> I think it will be more robust to look at statbuf to learn if the file type
>> is correct and the file is actually readable.
> 
> Could that file be unreadable or of wrong type?

It should be readable and the correct type when all goes well. Hence the term
"more robust".

> 
> Also I thought that since read_info_res_file() opens and reads that file any
> errors should be handled there. Shouldn't this part of the test only return
> whether the file is there or not since that indicates if something is supported
> in the kernel?

ok.


Reinette