linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tty: serial: Cleanup the bit shift with macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024011836-glimmer-seventh-f2a7@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:01:58 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Cc: crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com, jirislaby@...nel.org, LinoSanfilippo@....de,
	lukas@...ner.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tty: serial: Cleanup the bit shift with macro

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:56:23PM +0100, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> > This patch replaces the bit shift code with "_BITUL()" macro inside
> > "serial_rs485" struct.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Crescent CY Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/serial.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > index 53bc1af67..6c75ebdd7 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
> >  #define _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
> >  
> > +#include <linux/const.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  
> >  #include <linux/tty_flags.h>
> > @@ -140,14 +141,14 @@ struct serial_icounter_struct {
> >   */
> >  struct serial_rs485 {
> >  	__u32	flags;
> > -#define SER_RS485_ENABLED		(1 << 0)
> > -#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND		(1 << 1)
> > -#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND	(1 << 2)
> 
> In the old definition (1 << 3) wasn't used.
> 
> > -#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX		(1 << 4)
> > -#define SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS		(1 << 5)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDRB			(1 << 6)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_RECV		(1 << 7)
> > -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_DEST		(1 << 8)
> > +#define SER_RS485_ENABLED		_BITUL(0)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND		_BITUL(1)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND	_BITUL(2)
> > +#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX		_BITUL(3)
> 
> Isn't it a break if number 3 isn't skipped here as well?

Ugh, yes it is, good catch!

Care to send a patch to fix this up?

thanks,

greg k-h