linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:04:31 +0000
From: <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>
To: <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>,
	<sam@...nborg.org>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
	<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
	<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lee@...nel.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Linux4Microchip@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to
 json-schema

On 17/01/24 9:03 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> 
> ForwardedMessage.eml
> 
> Subject:
> Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: atmel,hlcdc: convert pwm bindings to 
> json-schema
> From:
> Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
> Date:
> 17/01/24, 9:03 pm
> 
> To:
> Dharma.B@...rochip.com
> CC:
> alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, 
> sam@...nborg.org, bbrezillon@...nel.org, 
> maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, 
> tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, 
> robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, 
> conor+dt@...nel.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, 
> claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, 
> u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, 
> Linux4Microchip@...rochip.com
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:43:00AM +0000,Dharma.B@...rochip.com  wrote:
>> On 17/01/24 1:40 am, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>
>>> On 16/01/2024 18:03:19+0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 05:07:59PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>>>>> Convert device tree bindings for Atmel's HLCDC PWM controller to YAML
>>>>> format.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani<dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> changelog
>>>>> v1 -> v2
>>>>> - Remove the explicit copyrights.
>>>>> - Modify title (not include words like binding/driver).
>>>>> - Modify description actually describing the hardware and not the driver.
>>>>> - Remove pinctrl properties which aren't required.
>>>>> - Drop parent node and it's other sub-device node which are not related here.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    .../bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    .../bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt          | 29 ------------
>>>>>    2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>>    delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel-hlcdc-pwm.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 000000000000..751122309fa9
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/atmel,hlcdc-pwm.yaml
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>> The original file has no license, but was originally written by a
>>>> free-electrons employee, so the relicensing here is fine.
>>>>
>>> I confirm relicensing is fine, even assigning the copyright to
>>> Microchip (note that Bootlin is legally the same entity as
>>> free-electrons)
>> Thanks Conor and Alexandre.
>> I will add the copyrights back in v3.
> Just to note, in case you misunderstood my original comment here:
> What I said had nothing to do with adding a Microchip copyright assignment
> to the file, but rather about the fact that your patch relicenses the
> binding from GPL v2 to GPL v2 OR BSD 2 Clause.
I appreciate the clarification; my initial understanding was not 
accurate. Thanks
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.