[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc17322010b049529054552bd44f63f1@dh-electronics.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 09:29:10 +0000
From: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com" <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>,
"jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>, "LinoSanfilippo@....de"
<LinoSanfilippo@....de>, "lukas@...ner.de" <lukas@...ner.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] tty: serial: Cleanup the bit shift with macro
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 8:02 AM
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 03:56:23PM +0100, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>> This patch replaces the bit shift code with "_BITUL()" macro inside
>>> "serial_rs485" struct.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Crescent CY Hsieh <crescentcy.hsieh@...a.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/serial.h | 17 +++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
>>> index 53bc1af67..6c75ebdd7 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/serial.h
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>> #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
>>> #define _UAPI_LINUX_SERIAL_H
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/const.h>
>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>>
>>> #include <linux/tty_flags.h>
>>> @@ -140,14 +141,14 @@ struct serial_icounter_struct {
>>> */
>>> struct serial_rs485 {
>>> __u32 flags;
>>> -#define SER_RS485_ENABLED (1 << 0)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND (1 << 1)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND (1 << 2)
>>
>> In the old definition (1 << 3) wasn't used.
>>
>>> -#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX (1 << 4)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_TERMINATE_BUS (1 << 5)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_ADDRB (1 << 6)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_RECV (1 << 7)
>>> -#define SER_RS485_ADDR_DEST (1 << 8)
>>> +#define SER_RS485_ENABLED _BITUL(0)
>>> +#define SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND _BITUL(1)
>>> +#define SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND _BITUL(2)
>>> +#define SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX _BITUL(3)
>>
>> Isn't it a break if number 3 isn't skipped here as well?
>
> Ugh, yes it is, good catch!
>
> Care to send a patch to fix this up?
OK, I'll make a patch.
Regards
Christoph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists