[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK4VdL20-9LPKJeWKB1hduNyE_TxSviKOaEnHJv3gEtZasFqYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:38:15 +0100
From: Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>
To: Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, lima@...ts.freedesktop.org,
anarsoul@...il.com, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, christian.koenig@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] drm/lima: handle spurious timeouts due to high irq latency
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 3:46 AM Qiang Yu <yuq825@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:12 AM Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
> > index 6a11764d87b3..34050facb110 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct lima_sched_task {
> > bool recoverable;
> > struct lima_bo *heap;
> >
> > + struct dma_fence *done_fence;
> This is same as the following fence, do we really need a duplicated one?
Checking again now, I think we can reuse the existing one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists