[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZaktH7xc72x4Xr3d@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:52:31 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Brain Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>,
Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@...edance.com>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: zswap.c: add xarray tree to zswap
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:20:29PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > /* walk the tree and free everything */
> > spin_lock(&tree->lock);
> > +
> > + xas_for_each(&xas, e, ULONG_MAX)
>
> Why not use xa_for_each?
xas_for_each() is O(n) while xa_for_each() is O(n log n), as mentioned
in the fine documentation. If you don't need to drop the lock while
in the body of the loop, always prefer xas_for_each().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists