linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 15/17] serial: max310x: replace bare use of 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' (checkpatch)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240118152213.2644269-16-hugo@hugovil.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:22:11 -0500
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	jirislaby@...nel.org,
	cosmin.tanislav@...log.com,
	andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
	shc_work@...l.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	hugo@...ovil.com,
	Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/17] serial: max310x: replace bare use of 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' (checkpatch)

From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>

Fixes the following checkpatch warnings:

    WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'

With this change, the affected functions now match the prototypes in
struct gpio_chip.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
index e39d8ea51e4e..9faea1224a58 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c
@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused max310x_resume(struct device *dev)
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(max310x_pm_ops, max310x_suspend, max310x_resume);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
-static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	unsigned int val;
 	struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ static int max310x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	return !!((val >> 4) & (1 << (offset % 4)));
 }
 
-static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
+static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
 {
 	struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port;
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static void max310x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
 			    value ? 1 << (offset % 4) : 0);
 }
 
-static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
+static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port;
@@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ static int max310x_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 }
 
 static int max310x_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
-					 unsigned offset, int value)
+					 unsigned int offset, int value)
 {
 	struct max310x_port *s = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	struct uart_port *port = &s->p[offset / 4].port;
-- 
2.39.2