[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b96d5bfc-cc38-44c7-a88f-e7ac5e4eb71d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:51:20 +0200
From: Ceclan Dumitru <mitrutzceclan@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, andy@...nel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>, Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@...gutronix.de>,
Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>, Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Ceclan Dumitru <dumitru.ceclan@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] dt-bindings: adc: add AD7173
On 1/18/24 17:23, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:49:22PM +0200, Dumitru Ceclan wrote:
..
>> + adi,clock-select:
>> + description: |
>> + Select the ADC clock source. Valid values are:
>> + int : Internal oscillator
>> + int-out : Internal oscillator with output on XTAL2 pin
>> + ext-clk : External clock input on XTAL2 pin
>> + xtal : External crystal on XTAL1 and XTAL2 pins
>> +
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>> + enum:
>> + - int
>> + - int-out
>> + - ext-clk
>> + - xtal
>> + default: int
> I am not a fan of properties like this one, that in my view reimplement
> things that are supported by the regular clocks properties. I've got
> some questions for you so I can understand whether or not this custom
> property is required.
>
> Whether or not the ext-clk or xtal is used is known based on
> clock-names - why is the custom property required to determine that?
> If neither of those clocks are present, then the internal clock would be
> used. Choosing to use the internal clock if an external one is provided
> sounds to me like a software policy decision made by the operating
> system.
If there was no int-out, sure. I considered that the choice between int
and int-out could be made here. So better for driver to choose int/int-out?
>
> Finally, if the ADC has a clock output, why can that not be represented
> by making the ADC a clock-controller?
>
Was not familiar with this/did not cross my mind. So if xtal/ext-clk is
present, the driver should detect it and disable the option for clock
output? (Common pin XTAL2)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists