[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e77d766b-1fd0-4135-b343-0c2bea068a6e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:59:27 -0500
From: Jacob Lott <jklott.git@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Add more details to Kconfig help
On 1/18/24 10:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:40:44AM -0500, Jacob Lott wrote:
>> The current help text is short and triggers a
>> warning from checkpatch.pl. This patch adds more
>> details to the help text which should provide better information
>> for whether or not to enable the driver.
> Please wrap your lines at 72 columns.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Lott <jklott.git@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig | 10 +++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> index b864023d3ccb..76a083fbe401 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ config RTS5208
>> tristate "Realtek PCI-E Card Reader RTS5208/5288 support"
>> depends on PCI && SCSI
>> help
>> - Say Y here to include driver code to support the Realtek
>> - PCI-E card reader rts5208/rts5288.
>> + Choose Y here to enable support for the Realtek PCI-E card reader RTS5208/5288.
> No tab? Didn't checkpatch complain about this when you ran it on this
> patch?
>
>> + This driver facilitates communication between the Linux kernel and the Realtek
>> + PCI-E card reader.
>>
>> - If this driver is compiled as a module, it will be named rts5208.
>> + If you opt to compile this driver as a module, it will be named rts5208. Selecting
>> + N will exclude this driver from the kernel build. Choose option Y if your system includes
>> + the Realtek PCI-E card reader rts5208/rts5288. When in doubt, it is generally safe
>> + to select N.
> Wrap your lines properly here at 80 columns.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Checkpatch is not pointing out any issues when I run it:
/scripts/checkpatch.pl
/tmp/0001-staging-rts5208-Add-more-details-to-Kconfig-help.pat
ch
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
/tmp/0001-staging-rts5208-Add-more-details-to-Kconfig-help.patch has no
obvious style problems and is ready for submission.
Does this indicate I need to set a configuration specifically for the
checkpatch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists