[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5766b575-e2db-4a56-9808-31a64bc72402@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 21:49:41 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, changbin.du@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] perf: script: add field 'insn_disam' to display
mnemonic instructions
On 18/01/24 06:12, Changbin Du wrote:
> In addition to the 'insn' field, this adds a new field 'insn_disam' to
> display mnemonic instructions instead of the raw code.
'disam' seems an unusual abbreviation, and the 'insn' part seems a bit
redundant. Could this be just 'disasm' instead of 'insn_disam'?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists