| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:07:18 +0000
From: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, "jasowang@...hat.com"
<jasowang@...hat.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xudingke
<xudingke@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in
tun_xdp_act
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willem de Bruijn [mailto:willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2024 10:44 PM
> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>; Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>; jasowang@...hat.com;
> kuba@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; xudingke
> <xudingke@...wei.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in tun_xdp_act
>
> wangyunjian wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Willem de Bruijn [mailto:willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2024 11:42 PM
> > > To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>;
> > > willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com; jasowang@...hat.com;
> > > kuba@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; xudingke
> > > <xudingke@...wei.com>; wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] tun: add missing rx stats accounting in
> > > tun_xdp_act
> > >
> > > Yunjian Wang wrote:
> > > > The TUN can be used as vhost-net backend, and it is necessary to
> > > > count the packets transmitted from TUN to vhost-net/virtio-net.
> > > > However, there are some places in the receive path that were not
> > > > taken into account when using XDP. The commit 8ae1aff0b331
> > > > ("tuntap: split out XDP logic") only includes dropped counter for
> > > > XDP_DROP, XDP_ABORTED, and invalid XDP actions. It would be
> > > > beneficial to also include new accounting for successfully
> > > > received bytes using dev_sw_netstats_rx_add and introduce new
> > > > dropped counter for XDP errors
> > > on XDP_TX and XDP_REDIRECT.
> > >
> > > From the description it is clear that these are two separate changes
> > > wrapped into one patch. I should have flagged this previously.
> >
> > Do I need to split these two modifications into 2 patches?
> > 1. only fix dropped counter
> > 2. add new accounting for successfully received bytes
> > Or:
> > Only fix dropped counter?
>
> It's definitely good to fix both.
>
> It might be a bit pedantic, but two separate patches is more correct.
>
> The second fix, add missing byte counter, goes back to the original introduction
> of XDP for tun, so has a different tag:
>
> Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
OK, I will update it to 2 patches.
Thanks
>
> >
> > >
> > > Ack on returning the error counter that was previously present and
> > > matches the Fixes tag.
> > >
> > > For the second change, I had to check a few other XDP capable
> > > drivers to verify that it is indeed common to count such packets.
> > >
> > > > Fixes: 8ae1aff0b331 ("tuntap: split out XDP logic")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v3: update commit log and code
> > > > v2: add Fixes tag
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/tun.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c index
> > > > afa5497f7c35..0704a17e74e1 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > > > @@ -1625,18 +1625,15 @@ static struct sk_buff
> > > > *__tun_build_skb(struct tun_file *tfile, static int
> > > > tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct *tun, struct
> > > bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > > > struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 act) {
> > > > - int err;
> > > > + unsigned int datasize = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> > > > + int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > switch (act) {
> > > > case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > > > err = xdp_do_redirect(tun->dev, xdp, xdp_prog);
> > > > - if (err)
> > > > - return err;
> > > > break;
> > > > case XDP_TX:
> > > > err = tun_xdp_tx(tun->dev, xdp);
> > > > - if (err < 0)
> > > > - return err;
> > > > break;
> > > > case XDP_PASS:
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -1651,6 +1648,13 @@ static int tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct
> > > > *tun,
> > > struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + if (err < 0) {
> > > > + act = err;
> > > > + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > > > + } else if (act == XDP_REDIRECT || act == XDP_TX) {
> > > > + dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Let's avoid adding yet another branch and just do these operations
> > > in the case statements, like XDP_DROP.
> >
> > Fix it like this?
>
> Perhaps avoid computing datasize is all paths, when it is not used in common
> XDP_PASS, high performance XDP_DROP and a few others. Not sure whether
> (all) compilers would optimze that.
>
> dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev, xdp,
>
xdp->data_end - xdp->data);
OK, I agree.
>
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> > @@ -1625,18 +1625,25 @@ static struct sk_buff *__tun_build_skb(struct
> > tun_file *tfile, static int tun_xdp_act(struct tun_struct *tun, struct
> bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
> > struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 act) {
> > + unsigned int datasize = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
> > int err;
> >
> > switch (act) {
> > case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > err = xdp_do_redirect(tun->dev, xdp, xdp_prog);
> > - if (err)
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > return err;
> > + }
> > + dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
> > break;
> > case XDP_TX:
> > err = tun_xdp_tx(tun->dev, xdp);
> > - if (err < 0)
> > + if (err < 0) {
> > + dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(tun->dev);
> > return err;
> > + }
> > + dev_sw_netstats_rx_add(tun->dev, datasize);
> > break;
> > case XDP_PASS:
> >
> > >
> > > > return act;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.41.0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists