[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8caa050-4296-4b3f-aded-ef41bdf7972d@proton.me>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:43:23 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] rust: types: add `NotThreadSafe`
On 1/18/24 15:36, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This introduces a new marker type for types that shouldn't be thread
> safe. By adding a field of this type to a struct, it becomes non-Send
> and non-Sync, which means that it cannot be accessed in any way from
> threads other than the one it was created on.
>
> This is useful for APIs that require globals such as `current` to remain
> constant while the value exists.
>
> We update two existing users in the Kernel to use this helper:
>
> * `Task::current()` - moving the return type of this value to a
> different thread would not be safe as you can no longer be guaranteed
> that the `current` pointer remains valid.
> * Lock guards. Mutexes and spinlocks should be unlocked on the same
> thread as where they were locked, so we enforce this using the Send
> trait.
>
> There are also additional users in later patches of this patchset. See
> [1] and [2] for the discussion that led to the introducion of this
> patch.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/nFDPJFnzE9Q5cqY7FwSMByRH2OAn_BpI4H53NQfWIlN6I2qfmAqnkp2wRqn0XjMO65OyZY4h6P4K2nAGKJpAOSzksYXaiAK_FoH_8QbgBI4=@proton.me/ [2]
> Suggested-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
--
Cheers,
Benno
Powered by blists - more mailing lists