lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE5UKNrU9YHoCQr8HLFf9-T4-NobQ4jWtryVqq9okFz8nVezgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 15:10:23 +0100
From: Łukasz Majczak <lma@...omium.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>, 
	Radoslaw Biernacki <biernacki@...gle.com>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, 
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, 
	Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Introduce EC-based watchdog

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:50 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On 1/19/24 00:43, Lukasz Majczak wrote:
> > Chromeos devices are equipped with the embedded controller (EC)
> > that can be used as a watchdog. The following patches
> > updates the structures and definitions required to
> > communicate with EC-based watchdog and implements the
> > driver itself.
> >
> > The previous version of this patch was sent here:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-watchdog/list/?series=817925
> >
> > Changelog
> > V2->V3:
> > * drop "-drv" from driver name
> > * use format #define<space>NAME<tab>value
> >
>
> I am a bit lost here. You dropped my Reviewed-by: tags, even though
> I specifically said that they applied with those changes made.
> Also, according to the above patch 1/3 was not changed at all.
>
> What else did you change that warrants dropping the tags ?
>
> Guenter
>
The "-drv" change was related to patch 2 and 3, and I have used
"format #define<space>NAME<tab>value" only in patch 3 (as
ec_commands.h is mixing those)
Sorry for dropping your "Reviewed-by" tag :( I've assumed (wrong) that
I cannot take it for granted sending V3.
Alos in such a case if there are changes in patch 2 and 3 and 1
remains untouched shall I send only 2 and 3 in the next version ?

Best regards,
Lukasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ