linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] ASoC: cs42l43: Add support for the cs42l43

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:13:59 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, lee@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, 
	yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, 
	pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, 
	patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] ASoC: cs42l43: Add support for the cs42l43

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:07 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:46:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 8:11 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 07:41:54PM +0200, andy.shevchenko@...il.com wrote:
> > > > Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:46:02AM +0100, Charles Keepax kirjoitti:
>
> > > > > +   unsigned int hs2 = 0x2 << CS42L43_HSDET_MODE_SHIFT;
>
> > > > BIT(1) ?
>
> > > Given that this is writing a value into a register field called "MODE"
> > > it seems very likely that it's an enumeration value rather than a
> > > bitmask (and similarly for all the other places where you're making
> > > similar comments).  Please think a bit more about the code being
> > > commented on when making these minor stylistic comments.
>
> > I read a bit further and have given a comment about this as you put it
> > above that they are plain values.
> > Please, read my comments in full.
>
> I did eventually find that while going through the other comments but
> given that the earlier ones hadn't been revised and it was all a bunch
> of different fields it still seemed useful to highlight, if nothing else
> it was a little unclear that your later comment applied to all the
> fields you were asking for updates to.

Yeah, I was thinking about that during the review, that's why I first
commented and then concluded that those comments are kinda bogus.

> In general in a case like this where the code is already in tree it does
> seem like it'd be better to just write patche for the stylistic issues.

Sure. I believe Charles will address some of them, if not all.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko