linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6630655f-282a-4a1e-99fe-46679fcf1e56@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 02:51:48 +0000
From: <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>
To: <conor@...nel.org>
CC: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>, <sam@...nborg.org>, <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
	<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, <mripard@...nel.org>,
	<tzimmermann@...e.de>, <airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lee@...nel.org>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Linux4Microchip@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: display: convert Atmel's HLCDC to DT
 schema

On 18/01/24 9:01 pm, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:56:10PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Convert the existing DT binding to DT schema of the Atmel's HLCDC display
>> controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani<dharma.b@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> changelog
>> v2 -> v3
>> - Remove '|' in description, as there is no formatting to preserve.
>> - Ref video-interfaces as endpoint.
>> - Remove ref and description for bus-width.
>> - Add new line before the child node in example.
>> - Remove 'example 2', as it is not required for just one additional property.
> Rob's comment on the previous version was:
> | Just 1 extra property doesn't justify 2 examples.
> |
> | In any case, drop the partial examples and just have 1 complete example
> | in the MFD binding schema.
> 
Okay understood, I will include the 'bus-width' in the example.
-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.