[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6FCCD287-152F-43AF-AF20-E8408E2CB378@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:54:50 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ligang.bdlg@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] hugetlb: pass *next_nid_to_alloc directly to
for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
> On Jan 18, 2024, at 20:39, Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> With parallelization of hugetlb allocation across different threads, each
> thread works on a differnet node to allocate pages from, instead of all
> allocating from a common node h->next_nid_to_alloc. To address this, it's
> necessary to assign a separate next_nid_to_alloc for each thread.
>
> Consequently, the hstate_next_node_to_alloc and for_each_node_mask_to_alloc
> have been modified to directly accept a *next_nid_to_alloc parameter,
> ensuring thread-specific allocation and avoiding concurrent access issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>
> Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists