[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5p1kyif.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:45:44 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, james.clark@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Support PERF_SAMPLE_READ with inherit_stat
Ben Gainey <ben.gainey@....com> writes:
> In this configuration stream ids (such as may appear in the read_format
> field of a PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) are no longer globally unique, rather
> the pair of (stream id, tid) uniquely identify each event. Tools that
> rely on this, for example to calculate a delta between samples, would
> need updating to take this into account. Previously valid event
> configurations (system-wide, no-inherit and so on) where each stream id
> is the identifier are unaffected.
So is this an ABI break? It might need an optin, if it breaks anything,
which wouldn't surprise me. We do have a lot of different perf stream
parsers around these days and we cannot break them.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists