[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a7cdcb3-03ef-46b8-8cda-e5d28801f6a0@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:19:43 +0000
From: <Ajay.Kathat@...rochip.com>
To: <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>, <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
<davidm@...uge.net>, <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] wifi: wilc1000: set preamble size to auto as default
in wilc_init_fw_config()
Hi Alexis,
On 1/19/24 00:43, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 1/18/24 17:52, Ajay.Kathat@...rochip.com wrote:
>> On 1/18/24 08:08, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> "WILC driver currently applies some default configuration whenever the firmware
>>> is initialized, and sets the default preamble size to short. However, despite
>>> this passed option, firmware is also able to successfully connect to access
>>> points only using long preamble, so this setting does not really enforce short
>>> preambles and is misleading regarding applied configuration.
>>>
>>> Update default configuration and make it match the firmware behavior by passing
>>> the existing WILC_FW_PREAMBLE_AUTO value (2 instead of 0). The updated setting
>>> does not really alter firmware behavior since it is still capable to connect to
>>> both short preamble and long preamble access points, but at list the setting now
>>> expresses for real the corresponding firmware behavior"
>>>
>>> To give a bit of context around this one: I do not have access to the firmware
>>> internals, I just took the patch from Ajay and I merely did some tests around it
>>> with multiple APs (basically, making a WILC STA connect and ping the AP), and
>>> ensured with wireshark to get at least one AP be really "locked" with long
>>> preamble, with WILC managing to connect to it.
>>>
>>
>> Here are some more details about this change. It have been implemented
>> to address the transmission(Tx) blackout issue observed in the 802.11b
>> mode. The modification has no impact on the other modes, which will
>> continue to work as they did in the previous implementation. This change
>> will allow the 802.11b transmission(2, 5.5, 11Mbps) to use long preamble.
>
> Ah, so it fixes a specific bug (and makes parts of my suggested description
> wrong). Has there been any report about this "TX blackout issue" on the mailing
> lists ? If so, we could enrich the message with some details from the report and
> add some missing Reported-By/Fixes/Closes tags.
>
For this issue, there are no details on the mailing lists. It was
discovered by internal QA team.
Regards,
Ajay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists