linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] libbpf: Move insn_is_pseudo_func() to libbpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYXayB91cXKktBXe_SMDLXhjNo3DGML6DuakLOysZ5jbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 13:18:27 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] libbpf: Move insn_is_pseudo_func() to libbpf_internal.h

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 3:10 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> Currently, insn_is_pseudo_func() is only used in libbpf.c, move it
> to libbpf_internal.h so that it can be used in test_verifier, this
> is preparation for later patch.
>
> Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c          | 5 -----
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index c5a42ac309fd..259d585d6ff5 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -748,11 +748,6 @@ static bool is_call_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
>         return insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL);
>  }
>
> -static bool insn_is_pseudo_func(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> -{
> -       return is_ldimm64_insn(insn) && insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC;
> -}
> -
>  static int
>  bpf_object__init_prog(struct bpf_object *obj, struct bpf_program *prog,
>                       const char *name, size_t sec_idx, const char *sec_name,
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> index 27e4e320e1a6..a9c337345aff 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
> @@ -532,6 +532,11 @@ static inline bool is_ldimm64_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn)
>         return insn->code == (BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW);
>  }
>
> +static inline bool insn_is_pseudo_func(struct bpf_insn *insn)
> +{
> +       return is_ldimm64_insn(insn) && insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC;
> +}
> +

This just adds more internal code of libbpf used by selftests. While
we've allowed it in some cases to avoid duplication of more complex
logic, I don't feel like it's justified in this case. These helpers
are trivial enough to copy/paste somewhere into selftests helpers
header, so please do that instead.

>  /* if fd is stdin, stdout, or stderr, dup to a fd greater than 2
>   * Takes ownership of the fd passed in, and closes it if calling
>   * fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 3).
> --
> 2.42.0
>