[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cirhP65hMsgD7Kt+puferoJ76i+p6f7EGJsaoh4a2eLag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:00:41 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/42] arch/x86/events/intel: Convert snprintf to sysfs_emit
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:53 PM Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com> wrote:
>
> Per filesystems/sysfs.rst, show() should only use sysfs_emit()
> or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting the value to be returned to user space.
>
> coccinelle complains that there are still a couple of functions that use
> snprintf(). Convert them to sysfs_emit().
>
> > ./arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5496:8-16: WARNING: please use sysfs_emit
> > ./arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5530:8-16: WARNING: please use sysfs_emit
> > ./arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5546:8-16: WARNING: please use sysfs_emit
> > ./arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c:99:8-16: WARNING: please use sysfs_emit
>
> No functional change intended
>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> CC: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> CC: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> CC: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: x86@...nel.org
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 6 +++---
> arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 0f2786d4e405..aa5fa64a923b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -5493,7 +5493,7 @@ static ssize_t show_sysctl_tfa(struct device *cdev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - return snprintf(buf, 40, "%d\n", allow_tsx_force_abort);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", allow_tsx_force_abort);
I guess the size doesn't matter here..
Anyway there's freeze_on_smi_show() even uses sprintf().
Thanks,
Namhyung
> }
>
> static ssize_t set_sysctl_tfa(struct device *cdev,
> @@ -5527,7 +5527,7 @@ static ssize_t branches_show(struct device *cdev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
> }
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(branches);
> @@ -5543,7 +5543,7 @@ static ssize_t pmu_name_show(struct device *cdev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", pmu_name_str);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", pmu_name_str);
> }
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(pmu_name);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> index 8e2a12235e62..30bba5f3a840 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static ssize_t pt_cap_show(struct device *cdev,
> container_of(attr, struct dev_ext_attribute, attr);
> enum pt_capabilities cap = (long)ea->var;
>
> - return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%x\n", intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(cap));
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%x\n", intel_pt_validate_hw_cap(cap));
> }
>
> static struct attribute_group pt_cap_group __ro_after_init = {
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists