linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:54:42 -0800
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
	antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
	alexander.shishkin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS_MASKING in most cases

On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> On 1/19/2024 8:21 AM, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> 
> > The goal is to compile test it whenever possible. As
> > SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS are ON by default, it wont get tested for most
> > configuration.
> 
> Sure, that would help increase the compile coverage. I wasn't sure how
> much of a difference it would make. Anyways, the restriction is expected
> to be short lived until LASS is available.

True.

> Please feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>

Thanks