[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240119205442.x44qiu7yjbo4xkdi@windy>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 12:54:42 -0800
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
alexander.shishkin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/lam: Disable ADDRESS_MASKING in most cases
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> On 1/19/2024 8:21 AM, Pawan Gupta wrote:
>
> > The goal is to compile test it whenever possible. As
> > SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS are ON by default, it wont get tested for most
> > configuration.
>
> Sure, that would help increase the compile coverage. I wasn't sure how
> much of a difference it would make. Anyways, the restriction is expected
> to be short lived until LASS is available.
True.
> Please feel free to add:
> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists