[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8511e5c6-eddb-4deb-932e-125e34cddba6@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:35:08 -0800
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xingwei lee <xrivendell7@...il.com>, "Jann
Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>, <houtao1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/3] x86/mm: Move is_vsyscall_vaddr() into
mm_internal.h
On 1/18/2024 11:30 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
>
> Moving is_vsyscall_vaddr() into mm_internal.h to make it available for
> copy_from_kernel_nofault_allowed() in arch/x86/mm/maccess.c.
>
Instead of mm_internal.h would a better place for is_vsyscall_vaddr() be
arch/x86/include/asm/vsyscall.h?
Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists