[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240120203904.8f36140cd2f507b25e9a09a3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:39:04 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, shuah@...nel.org, donettom@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: mm: fix map_hugetlb failure on 64K page
size systems
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 06:14:29 -0700 Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com> wrote:
> On systems with 64k page size and 512M huge page sizes, the allocation
> and test succeeds but errors out at the munmap. As the comment states,
> munmap will failure if its not HUGEPAGE aligned. This is due to the
> length of the mapping being 1/2 the size of the hugepage causing the
> munmap to not be hugepage aligned. Fix this by making the mapping length
> the full hugepage if the hugepage is larger than the length of the
> mapping.
Is
Fixes: fa7b9a805c79 ("tools/selftest/vm: allow choosing mem size and page size in map_hugetlb")
a suitable Fixes: target for this?
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/map_hugetlb.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/map_hugetlb.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include "vm_util.h"
>
> #define LENGTH (256UL*1024*1024)
> #define PROTECTION (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE)
> @@ -58,10 +59,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> void *addr;
> int ret;
> + size_t hugepage_size;
> size_t length = LENGTH;
> int flags = FLAGS;
> int shift = 0;
>
> + hugepage_size = default_huge_page_size();
> + /* munmap with fail if the length is not page aligned */
> + if (hugepage_size > length)
> + length = hugepage_size;
> +
> if (argc > 1)
> length = atol(argv[1]) << 20;
> if (argc > 2) {
> --
> 2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists