linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: correct gcc_gmac0_sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:39:41 +0800
From: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
 richardcochran@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
 angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] clk: qcom: gcc-ipq5018: correct gcc_gmac0_sys_clk reg

在 2024/1/22 0:28, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:42:33PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:
> 
> This, and all your patches need a Commit message.
> 
> What is the effect of this typo? What is broken because of it? Should
> this be backported to stable? Does it need a Fixed: tag?
> 

Sorry for this, will add in upcoming patches.

>> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@...look.com>
> 
> 
>      Andrew
> 
> ---
> pw-bot: cr