linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] pwm: sprd: Add sprd,ums9620-pwm compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1cf604e5-3fa7-4908-8cdb-90816b703ae5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:45:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
 Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenhua lin <wenhua.lin1994@...il.com>,
 Xiongpeng Wu <xiongpeng.wu@...soc.com>, zhaochen su
 <zhaochen.su29@...il.com>, Zhaochen Su <Zhaochen.Su@...soc.com>,
 Xiaolong Wang <Xiaolong.Wang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] pwm: sprd: Add sprd,ums9620-pwm compatible

On 22/01/2024 09:17, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> Add sprd,ums9620-pwm compatible string to binding document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@...soc.com>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts_getmaintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, use mainline), work on fork of kernel (don't, use
mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really don't). Just use b4 and
all the problems go away.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
the process allowing the patch to be tested.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof