[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4779b12-bb10-4957-a83d-8569f09421ff@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:41:29 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, irogers@...gle.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>, Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Fix session topology test on heterogeneous
systems
On 2024-01-22 10:54 a.m., James Clark wrote:
> The test currently fails with this message when evlist__new_default()
> opens more than one event:
>
> 32: Session topology :
> --- start ---
> templ file: /tmp/perf-test-vv5YzZ
> Using CPUID 0x00000000410fd070
> Opening: unknown-hardware:HG
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> perf_event_attr:
> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> config 0xb00000000
> disabled 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 4
> Opening: unknown-hardware:HG
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> perf_event_attr:
> type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
> config 0xa00000000
> disabled 1
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sys_perf_event_open: pid 0 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 5
> non matching sample_type
> FAILED tests/topology.c:73 can't get session
> ---- end ----
> Session topology: FAILED!
>
> This is because when re-opening the file and parsing the header, Perf
> expects that any file that has more than one event has the session ID
> flag set. Perf record already sets the flag in a similar way when there
> is more than one event, so add the same logic to evlist__new_default().
>
> evlist__new_default() is only currently used in tests, so I don't
> expect this change to have any other side effects.
>
> The session topology test has been failing on Arm big.LITTLE platforms
> since commit 251aa040244a ("perf parse-events: Wildcard most
> "numeric" events") when evlist__new_default() started opening multiple
> events for 'cycles'.
>
> Fixes: 251aa040244a ("perf parse-events: Wildcard most "numeric" events")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Verified on an Intel hybrid machine.
Tested-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Kan
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index 95f25e9fb994..56db37fac6f6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct evlist *evlist__new_default(void)
> struct evlist *evlist = evlist__new();
> bool can_profile_kernel;
> int err;
> + struct evsel *evsel;
>
> if (!evlist)
> return NULL;
> @@ -106,6 +107,10 @@ struct evlist *evlist__new_default(void)
> evlist = NULL;
> }
>
> + if (evlist->core.nr_entries > 1)
> + evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel)
> + evsel__set_sample_id(evsel, false);
> +
> return evlist;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists