[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240122171751.272074-1-david@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:17:51 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] mm/memory: fix folio_set_dirty() vs. folio_mark_dirty() in zap_pte_range()
The correct folio replacement for "set_page_dirty()" is
"folio_mark_dirty()", not "folio_set_dirty()". Using the latter won't
properly inform the FS using the dirty_folio() callback.
This has been found by code inspection, but likely this can result in
some real trouble when zapping dirty PTEs that point at clean pagecache
folios.
Reported-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2445cedb-61fb-422c-8bfb-caf0a2beed62@arm.com
Fixes: c46265030b0f ("mm/memory: page_remove_rmap() -> folio_remove_rmap_pte()")
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 7e1f4849463aa..89bcae0b224d6 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
delay_rmap = 0;
if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
if (pte_dirty(ptent)) {
- folio_set_dirty(folio);
+ folio_mark_dirty(folio);
if (tlb_delay_rmap(tlb)) {
delay_rmap = 1;
force_flush = 1;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists