lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:07:28 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@...ia.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier

On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:52:55AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/19/2024 10:38 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 05:38:11PM +0100, Stefan Wiehler wrote:
> > > rcu_cpu_starting() must be called before clockevents_register_device() to avoid
> > > the following lockdep splat triggered by calling list_add() when
> > > CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:
> > > 
> > >    WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> > >    ...
> > >    -----------------------------
> > >    kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3680 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> > > 
> > >    other info that might help us debug this:
> > > 
> > >    RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> > >    rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> > >    no locks held by swapper/1/0.
> > >    ...
> > >    Call Trace:
> > >    [<ffffffff8012a434>] show_stack+0x64/0x158
> > >    [<ffffffff80a93d98>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xc4
> > >    [<ffffffff801c9e9c>] __lock_acquire+0x1404/0x2940
> > >    [<ffffffff801cbf3c>] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x448
> > >    [<ffffffff80aa4260>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x88
> > >    [<ffffffff8021e0c8>] clockevents_register_device+0x60/0x1e8
> > >    [<ffffffff80130ff0>] r4k_clockevent_init+0x220/0x3a0
> > >    [<ffffffff801339d0>] start_secondary+0x50/0x3b8
> > > 
> > > raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
> > > before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.
> > > 
> > > See also commit 29368e093921 ("x86/smpboot:  Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier"),
> > > commit de5d9dae150c ("s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") and commit
> > > 99f070b62322 ("powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier").
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@...ia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree?  What
> > kernel(s) should this be applied to?
> 
> The upstream commit is 55702ec9603ebeffb15e6f7b113623fe1d8872f4 ("mips/smp:
> Call rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier") and this change from Stefan
> should be applied to both the 6.1 stable and 6.6 stable branches. Thanks!

Thanks, now queued up.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ