lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 14:25:58 +0800
From: hui liu <quic_huliu@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross
	<agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: dts: qcom: qcm6490-idp: Add definition for
 three LEDs



On 1/22/2024 1:42 PM, hui liu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, hui liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@...cinc.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the 
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is 
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> the best idea.
>>>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no 
>>>>>> consumer to
>>>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for 
>>>>> your
>>>>> Makefile target).
>>>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
>>>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
>>>
>>> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
>>> of multi-led with three components?
> 
>> In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on 
>> device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui

I double confirmed the HW design, for IDP devcie, we should set it to 
multi led, for another similar device(RB3-GEN2, I will push LED change 
for this device later), it should be set to seperate LED.
They are different, so I will push V6 to set it for multi-led for 
QCM6490-IDP device. Thanks for your review.

>>>
>>>>
>>>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>>>> +       #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> +       #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +       status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> +       led@1 {
>>>> +               reg = <1>;
>>>> +               color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>>>> +               function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> +       };
>>>> +
>>>> +       led@2 {
>>>> +               reg = <2>;
>>>> +               color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>>>> +               function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> +       };
>>>> +
>>>> +       led@3 {
>>>> +               reg = <3>;
>>>> +               color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>>>> +               function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> +       };
>>>> +};
>>>
>>>
>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ