[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3980816.1705960879@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 22:01:19 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > - ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - goto err_unuse;
> > + if (object->ondemand) {
> > + ret = cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(object);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto err_unuse;
> > + }
>
> I'm not sure if object->ondemand shall be checked by the caller or
> inside cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(), as
> cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() is also called without checking
> object->ondemand. cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object() won't trigger the
> NULL oops as the called cachefiles_ondemand_send_req() will actually
> checks that.
Meh. The above doesn't actually build if CONFIG_CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND=N. I
think I have to push the check down into cachefiles_ondemand_init_object()
instead.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists