[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240122230526.GF31555@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:05:26 +0100
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 6.8-rc2
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 02:54:31PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 14:34, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Bah. These fixes are garbage. Now my machine doesn't even boot. I'm
> > bisecting
Ah, sorry.
> My bisection says
>
> 1e7f6def8b2370ecefb54b3c8f390ff894b0c51b is the first bad commit
We got a report today [1] that this commit is indeed bad,
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CABq1_vj4GpUeZpVG49OHCo-3sdbe2-2ROcu_xDvUG-6-5zPRXg@mail.gmail.com/
the timing was also unfortuate and too late to recall the pull request.
> but I'll still have to verify by testing the revert on top of my current tree.
>
> It did revert cleanly, but I also note that if the zstd case is wrong,
> I assume the other very similar commits (for zlib and lzo) are
> potentially also wrong.
>
> Let me reboot to verify that at least my machine boots.
Per the report revert makes it work again and zlib and lzo cases are not
affected.
I can send a pull request reverting all the three until we figure out
what's wrong, or you can do it as all revert cleanly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists