linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v9 0/5] net: phy: generic polarity + LED support for qca808x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65aef6d0.050a0220.54d73.c4e9@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 00:14:20 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	William Zhang <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
	Anand Gore <anand.gore@...adcom.com>,
	Kursad Oney <kursad.oney@...adcom.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
	Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>,
	Sven Schwermer <sven.schwermer@...ruptive-technologies.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v9 0/5] net: phy: generic polarity + LED support
 for qca808x

On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:55:26PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Looks like we're missing some tags from DTB maintainers here.
> > Andrew, is there some urgency in getting this merged or can we
> > defer until v6.9?
>

Should I send a new version now that net-next is open again or it's ok?

-- 
	Ansuel