linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Sort entries by SoC then board compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXv+5FVOb_X02ovGgwZ=5YpipiCfO9SKD5hOrx9eweps9bB+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:17:54 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: Sort entries by SoC
 then board compatibles

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:02 PM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
> On 13/12/2023 16:04, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Some of the new MediaTek board entries were inserted in a chronological
> > order, or just randomly. This makes it harder to search for an entry.
> >
> > Sort the entries by first grouping by SoC, then sorting by board
> > compatible strings. Also add a comment at the top asking people to do
> > the same.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> Does not apply cleanly, would you mind to rebase the whole series onto v68-rc1.

Sure. There's still a bit of discussion on patch 6. After that is resolved
I'll send a v5 which will also address some review comments.

ChenYu