[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11a40f8d-baaf-48c8-b921-fbf764722475@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:24:21 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, changbin.du@...il.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] perf: util: use capstone disasm engine to show
assembly instructions
On 20/01/24 11:13, Changbin Du wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 19/01/24 12:48, Changbin Du wrote:
>>> Currently, the instructions of samples are shown as raw hex strings
>>> which are hard to read. x86 has a special option '--xed' to disassemble
>>> the hex string via intel XED tool.
>>>
>>> Here we use capstone as our disassembler engine to give more friendly
>>> instructions. We select libcapstone because capstone can provide more
>>> insn details. Perf will fallback to raw instructions if libcapstone is
>>> not available.
>>>
>>> The advantages compared to XED tool:
>>> * Support arm, arm64, x86-32, x86_64 (more could be supported),
>>> xed only for x86_64.
>>> * Immediate address operands are shown as symbol+offs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 8 +--
>>> tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
>>> tools/perf/util/print_insn.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> tools/perf/util/print_insn.h | 14 ++++
>>> 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>>> index b1f57401ff23..4817a37f16e2 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>> #include "util/event.h"
>>> #include "ui/ui.h"
>>> #include "print_binary.h"
>>> +#include "print_insn.h"
>>> #include "archinsn.h"
>>> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> @@ -1511,11 +1512,8 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample,
>>> if (PRINT_FIELD(INSNLEN))
>>> printed += fprintf(fp, " ilen: %d", sample->insn_len);
>>> if (PRINT_FIELD(INSN) && sample->insn_len) {
>>> - int i;
>>> -
>>> - printed += fprintf(fp, " insn:");
>>> - for (i = 0; i < sample->insn_len; i++)
>>> - printed += fprintf(fp, " %02x", (unsigned char)sample->insn[i]);
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, " insn: ");
>>
>> "insn:" seems unnecessary. Also xed prints 2 tabs, which
>> helps line up the output. Perhaps 1 tab and 2 spaces is
>> enough.
>>
> The "insn:" is used by xed. So it can not be removed if we preserve xed
> function.
I got mixed up - it is patch 3 that the comment is meant for.
>
> For 'insn' field, I keep the original output format.
> For 'disasm' field, we can line up the output. I changed to 2 tabs and removed
> 'insn:'.
That is better, thanks!
>
>>> + printed += sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
>>> }
>>> if (PRINT_FIELD(BRSTACKINSN) || PRINT_FIELD(BRSTACKINSNLEN))
>>> printed += perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(sample, thread, attr, machine, fp);
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
>>> index 988473bf907a..c33aab53d8dd 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
>>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ perf-y += perf_regs.o
>>> perf-y += perf-regs-arch/
>>> perf-y += path.o
>>> perf-y += print_binary.o
>>> +perf-y += print_insn.o
>>> perf-y += rlimit.o
>>> perf-y += argv_split.o
>>> perf-y += rbtree.o
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..162be4856f79
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> +/*
>>> + * Instruction binary disassembler based on capstone.
>>> + *
>>> + * Author(s): Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>
>>> + */
>>> +#include "print_insn.h"
>>
>> Please put with the other non-system includes
>>
> done.
>
>>> +#include <stdlib.h>
>>> +#include <string.h>
>>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>> +#include "util/debug.h"
>>
>> util/ not needed
>>
> done.
>
>>> +#include "util/symbol.h"
>>
>> util/ not needed
>>
> done.
>
>>> +#include "machine.h"
>>> +
>>> +size_t sample__fprintf_insn_raw(struct perf_sample *sample, FILE *fp)
>>> +{
>>> + int printed = 0;
>>> +
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < sample->insn_len; i++)
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, "%02x ", (unsigned char)sample->insn[i]);
>>
>> Why change this to put a space on the end?
>>
> Removed the tailing space.
>
>>> + return printed;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT
>>> +#include <capstone/capstone.h>
>>> +
>>> +static int capstone_init(struct machine *machine, csh *cs_handle)
>>> +{
>>> + cs_arch arch;
>>> + cs_mode mode;
>>> +
>>> + if (machine__is(machine, "x86_64")) {
>>> + arch = CS_ARCH_X86;
>>> + mode = CS_MODE_64;
>>> + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86")) {
>>> + arch = CS_ARCH_X86;
>>> + mode = CS_MODE_32;
>>> + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "arm64")) {
>>> + arch = CS_ARCH_ARM64;
>>> + mode = CS_MODE_ARM;
>>> + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "arm")) {
>>> + arch = CS_ARCH_ARM;
>>> + mode = CS_MODE_ARM + CS_MODE_V8;
>>> + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "s390")) {
>>> + arch = CS_ARCH_SYSZ;
>>> + mode = CS_MODE_BIG_ENDIAN;
>>> + } else {
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (cs_open(arch, mode, cs_handle) != CS_ERR_OK) {
>>> + pr_warning_once("cs_open failed\n");
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + cs_option(*cs_handle, CS_OPT_SYNTAX, CS_OPT_SYNTAX_ATT);
>>
>> That's only needed for x86 isn't it
>>
> Moved into below branch.
>
>>> + if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86"))
>>> + cs_option(*cs_handle, CS_OPT_DETAIL, CS_OPT_ON);
>>
>> Why? Could use a comment.
>>
> /*
> * Resolving address oprands to symbols is implemented
oprands -> operands
> * on x86 by investigating instruction details.
> */
>
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static size_t print_insn_x86(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
>>> + cs_insn *insn, FILE *fp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct addr_location al;
>>> + size_t printed = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (insn->detail && insn->detail->x86.op_count == 1) {
>>> + cs_x86_op *op = &insn->detail->x86.operands[0];
>>> +
>>> + addr_location__init(&al);
>>
>> Missing addr_location__exit()
>>
> Fixed.
>
>>> +
>>> + if (op->type == X86_OP_IMM &&
>>> + thread__find_symbol(thread, sample->cpumode, op->imm, &al)) {
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s ", insn[0].mnemonic);
>>> + printed += symbol__fprintf_symname_offs(al.sym, &al, fp);
>>> + return printed;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s %s", insn[0].mnemonic, insn[0].op_str);
>>> + return printed;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
>>> + struct machine *machine, FILE *fp)
>>> +{
>>> + static csh cs_handle;
>>
>> Why static?
>>
> Removed. See below.
>
>>> + cs_insn *insn;
>>> + size_t count;
>>> + size_t printed = 0;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = capstone_init(machine, &cs_handle);
>>
>> Does this really need to be done every time?
>>
> Only need to init once exactly. The problem is I cannot find a appropriate
> place to do the initiation.
>
> I tried to initiate on first call but we still need a global mutex to be
> initiated.
>
> So finally I fallback to initiate every time. The redundant initiation is
> acceptable per my test.
OK, could add a FIXME
>
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + /* fallback */
>>> + return sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + count = cs_disasm(cs_handle, (uint8_t *)sample->insn, sample->insn_len,
>>> + sample->ip, 1, &insn);
>>> + if (count > 0) {
>>> + if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86"))
>>> + printed += print_insn_x86(sample, thread, &insn[0], fp);
>>> + else
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s %s", insn[0].mnemonic, insn[0].op_str);
>>> + cs_free(insn, count);
>>> + } else {
>>> + printed += fprintf(fp, "illegal instruction");
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + cs_close(&cs_handle);
>>> + return printed;
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread __maybe_unused,
>>> + struct machine *machine __maybe_unused, FILE *fp)
>>> +{
>>> + return sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..af8fa5d01fb7
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>>> +#ifndef PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H
>>
>> Here and elsewhere
>>
>> ISNS -> INSN
>>
> fixed.
>
>>> +#define PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H
>>> +
>>> +#include <stddef.h>
>>> +#include <stdio.h>
>>> +#include "event.h"
>>> +#include "util/thread.h"
>>
>> Instead of including event.h and thread.h, just forward declare:
>>
>> struct perf_sample;
>> struct thread;
>> struct machine;
>>
> Why forward declaration?
That is how it is done in perf tools. It avoids unnecessary dependency
among headers.
>
>>> +
>>> +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
>>> + struct machine *machine, FILE *fp);
>>> +size_t sample__fprintf_insn_raw(struct perf_sample *sample, FILE *fp);
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H */
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists