linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] rtc: sophgo: add rtc support for Sophgo CV1800 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJRtX8R9bZZyU_6XZ+G_rctRu3TTEAUamVbq1h8q+Fzzd6SZiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:42:53 +0800
From: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, chao.wei@...hgo.com, 
	unicorn_wang@...look.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com, 
	aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	dlan@...too.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] rtc: sophgo: add rtc support for Sophgo CV1800 SoC

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:37 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 22/01/2024 09:34, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:17 PM Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22/01/2024 16:06:30+0800, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> >>> Implement the RTC driver for CV1800, which able to provide time alarm
> >>> and calibrate functionality.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Depends on https://lore.kernel.org/all/IA1PR20MB4953C774D41EDF1EADB6EC18BB6D2@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com/
> >>
> >> What is the dependency?
> >>
> >
> > Thank you, this driver requires support from the CLK driver.
>
> How? This is really unusual. Just to remind: we talk about build
> dependencies. Other do not matter for new drivers, right? Otherwise what
> is being broken and how it could be even broken?
>
yes, you're right. This is wrong, I will drop it.

Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu