[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d0a80a6-dba5-4db8-a7a8-73d4ffe7a37e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:50:43 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: light: Squash APDS9300 and
APDS9960 schemas
On 21/01/2024 06:17, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> Squashing Avago (Broadcom) APDS9300 and APDS9960 schemas into one
> file and removing the other. This is done as per the below review:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4e785d2e-d310-4592-a75a-13549938dcef@linaro.org/
>
> This patch series adds the driver support and device tree binding schemas
Please do not use "This commit/patch/change", but imperative mood. See
longer explanation here:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
Also, this is one commit, not patch series. Please write commit msg
explaining why and what you are doing.
> for APDS9306 Ambient Light Sensor. It was pointed out in earlier reviews
> that the schemas for APDS9300 and APDS9960 looks similar and should be
> merged. This particular patch does the first operation of merging
> APDS9300 and APDS9960 schema files.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95
>
> Signed-off-by: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
With changes above and what Jonathan asks:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
---
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists