linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: powerclamp: Remove dead code for target mwait value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jVKNEnwuep=Jq=cGTpq=NW9Pbu2AEduzmpv+L5Gec2Lw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:01:12 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lukasz.luba@....com, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: powerclamp: Remove dead code for target
 mwait value

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:23 PM Srinivas Pandruvada
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> After conversion of this driver to use powercap idle_inject core, this
> driver doesn't use target_mwait value. So remove dead code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> Non urgent patch. For 6.9+ kernel.
>
>  drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 32 ------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> index 5ac5cb60bae6..bc6eb0dd66a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
>   */
>  #define DEFAULT_DURATION_JIFFIES (6)
>
> -static unsigned int target_mwait;
>  static struct dentry *debug_dir;
>  static bool poll_pkg_cstate_enable;
>
> @@ -312,34 +311,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(window_size, "sliding window in number of clamping cycles\n"
>         "\twindow size results in slower response time but more smooth\n"
>         "\tclamping results. default to 2.");
>
> -static void find_target_mwait(void)
> -{
> -       unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> -       unsigned int highest_cstate = 0;
> -       unsigned int highest_subcstate = 0;
> -       int i;
> -
> -       if (boot_cpu_data.cpuid_level < CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF)
> -               return;
> -
> -       cpuid(CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> -
> -       if (!(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_EXTENSIONS_SUPPORTED) ||
> -           !(ecx & CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK))
> -               return;
> -
> -       edx >>= MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE;
> -       for (i = 0; i < 7 && edx; i++, edx >>= MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) {
> -               if (edx & MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK) {
> -                       highest_cstate = i;
> -                       highest_subcstate = edx & MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK;
> -               }
> -       }
> -       target_mwait = (highest_cstate << MWAIT_SUBSTATE_SIZE) |
> -               (highest_subcstate - 1);
> -
> -}
> -
>  struct pkg_cstate_info {
>         bool skip;
>         int msr_index;
> @@ -759,9 +730,6 @@ static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
>
> -       /* find the deepest mwait value */
> -       find_target_mwait();
> -
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --

Applied as 6.8-rc material, thanks!