[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<IA1PR20MB4953F82E9412E55397FE9C66BB752@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 11:04:52 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>,
Chao Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Xiaoguang Xing <xiaoguang.xing@...hgo.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] riscv: dts: sophgo: separate sg2042 mtime and mtimecmp to fit aclint format
Hi Conor,
I have already noticed the binding is merged. But the dt patch is not,
I wonder if it is the time to merge this dt change?
Regards,
Inochi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists