[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240122123845.3822570-11-dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:38:43 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] afs: Fix missing/incorrect unlocking of RCU read lock
In afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(), we need to unlock the RCU read lock in both
places before returning (and not lock it again).
Fixes: f94f70d39cc2 ("afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401172243.cd53d5f6-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
---
fs/afs/proc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/proc.c b/fs/afs/proc.c
index 3bd02571f30d..15eab053af6d 100644
--- a/fs/afs/proc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/proc.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
if (!preflist) {
seq_puts(m, "NO PREFS\n");
- return 0;
+ goto out;
}
seq_printf(m, "PROT SUBNET PRIOR (v=%u n=%u/%u/%u)\n",
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
}
}
- rcu_read_lock();
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists