linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: remove duplicate ifdefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87cyttedjj.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:20:13 +0530
From: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@...nel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net,
 linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 mpe@...erman.id.au, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
 anton@...era.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs: remove duplicate ifdefs

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 01:33:25 PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> when a ifdef is used in the below manner, second one could be considered as
> duplicate.
>
> ifdef DEFINE_A
> ...code block...
> ifdef DEFINE_A
> ...code block...
> endif
> ...code block...
> endif
>
> There are few places in fs code where above pattern was seen.
> No functional change is intended here. It only aims to improve code
> readability.
>

Can you please post the xfs changes as a separate patch along with Darrick's
RVB tag? This will make it easy for me to apply the resulting patch to the XFS
tree.

-- 
Chandan