linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/21] spi: s3c64xx: use full mask for {RX, TX}_FIFO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240123153421.715951-10-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:34:08 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: broonie@...nel.org,
	andi.shyti@...nel.org,
	arnd@...db.de
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	andre.draszik@...aro.org,
	peter.griffin@...aro.org,
	semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
	kernel-team@...roid.com,
	willmcvicker@...gle.com,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/21] spi: s3c64xx: use full mask for {RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL

SPI_STATUSn.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL fields  show the data level in the RX and
TX FIFOs. The IP supports FIFOs from 8 to 256 bytes, but apart from the
MODE_CFG.{RX, TX}_RDY_LVL fields that configure the {RX, TX} FIFO
trigger level in the interrupt mode, there's nothing in the registers
that configure the FIFOs depth. Is the responsibility of the SoC that
integrates the IP to dictate the FIFO depth and of the SPI driver to
make sure it doesn't bypass the FIFO length.

{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL was used to pass the FIFO length information based on
the IP configuration in the SoC. Its value was defined so that it
includes the entire FIFO length. For example, if one wanted to specify a
64 FIFO length (0x40), it wold configure the FIFO level to 127 (0x7f).
This is not only wrong, because it doesn't respect the IP's register
fields, it's also misleading. Use the full mask for the
SPI_STATUSn.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL fields. No change in functionality is
expected.

Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 128c3b8211ce..a06b83b952c6 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_INT_RX_FIFORDY_EN		BIT(1)
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_INT_TX_FIFORDY_EN		BIT(0)
 
+#define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL		GENMASK(23, 15)
+#define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL		GENMASK(14, 6)
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_OVERRUN_ERR		BIT(5)
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_UNDERRUN_ERR		BIT(4)
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_OVERRUN_ERR		BIT(3)
@@ -107,9 +109,6 @@
 #define FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) ((i)->port_conf->fifo_lvl_mask[i->port_id])
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(v, i) (((v) & \
 				(1 << (i)->port_conf->tx_st_done)) ? 1 : 0)
-#define TX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> 6) & FIFO_LVL_MASK(i))
-#define RX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> (i)->port_conf->rx_lvl_offset) & \
-					FIFO_LVL_MASK(i))
 #define FIFO_DEPTH(i) ((FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) >> 1) + 1)
 
 #define S3C64XX_SPI_POLLING_SIZE	32
@@ -218,7 +217,7 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
 	loops = msecs_to_loops(1);
 	do {
 		val = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-	} while (TX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd) && loops--);
+	} while (FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL, val) && loops--);
 
 	if (loops == 0)
 		dev_warn(&sdd->pdev->dev, "Timed out flushing TX FIFO\n");
@@ -227,7 +226,7 @@ static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd)
 	loops = msecs_to_loops(1);
 	do {
 		val = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-		if (RX_FIFO_LVL(val, sdd))
+		if (FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL, val))
 			readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_RX_DATA);
 		else
 			break;
@@ -498,10 +497,11 @@ static u32 s3c64xx_spi_wait_for_timeout(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 
 	do {
 		status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-	} while (RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd) < max_fifo && --val);
+	} while (FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL, status) < max_fifo &&
+		 --val);
 
 	/* return the actual received data length */
-	return RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd);
+	return FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL, status);
 }
 
 static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 	if (!xfer->rx_buf) {
 		val = msecs_to_loops(10);
 		status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-		while ((TX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd)
+		while ((FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL, status)
 			|| !S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(status, sdd))
 		       && --val) {
 			cpu_relax();
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 
 	/* sleep during signal transfer time */
 	status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-	if (RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd) < xfer->len)
+	if (FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL, status) < xfer->len)
 		usleep_range(time_us / 2, time_us);
 
 	if (use_irq) {
@@ -574,7 +574,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_pio(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
 	val = msecs_to_loops(ms);
 	do {
 		status = readl(regs + S3C64XX_SPI_STATUS);
-	} while (RX_FIFO_LVL(status, sdd) < xfer->len && --val);
+	} while (FIELD_GET(S3C64XX_SPI_ST_RX_FIFO_LVL, status) < xfer->len &&
+		 --val);
 
 	if (!val)
 		return -EIO;
-- 
2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog