linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/vmware: Add TDX hypercall support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <351B1153-9CBE-4774-9FAF-770F9F36856E@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:17:48 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
CC: x86@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        zackr@...are.com, linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
        pv-drivers@...are.com, namit@...are.com, timothym@...are.com,
        akaher@...are.com, jsipek@...are.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
        mripard@...nel.org, maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
        horms@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] x86/vmware: Add TDX hypercall support

On January 22, 2024 4:04:33 PM PST, Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 1/22/24 10:28 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On January 22, 2024 8:32:22 AM PST, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/9/24 00:40, Alexey Makhalov wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST
>>>> +unsigned long vmware_tdx_hypercall(unsigned long cmd,
>>>> +				   struct tdx_module_args *args)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	if (!hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_VMWARE))
>>>> +		return ULONG_MAX;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (cmd & ~VMWARE_CMD_MASK) {
>>>> +		pr_warn_once("Out of range command %lx\n", cmd);
>>>> +		return ULONG_MAX;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	args->r10 = VMWARE_TDX_VENDOR_LEAF;
>>>> +	args->r11 = VMWARE_TDX_HCALL_FUNC;
>>>> +	args->r12 = VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_MAGIC;
>>>> +	args->r13 = cmd;
>>>> +	args->r15 = 0; /* CPL */
>>>> +
>>>> +	__tdx_hypercall(args);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return args->r12;
>>>> +}
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vmware_tdx_hypercall);
>>>> +#endif
>>> 
>>> This is the kind of wrapper that I was hoping for.  Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>>> 
>> 
>> I'm slightly confused by this TBH.
>> 
>> Why are the arguments passed in as a structure, which is modified by the wrapper to boot? This is analogous to a system call interface.
>> 
>> Furthermore, this is an out-of-line function; it should never be called with !X86_HYPER_VMWARE or you are introducing overhead for other hypervisors; I believe a pr_warn_once() is in order at least, just as you have for the out-of-range test.
>> 
>
>This patch series introduces vmware_hypercall family of functions similar to kvm_hypercall. Similarity: both vmware and kvm implementations are static inline functions and both of them use __tdx_hypercall (global not exported symbol). Difference: kvm_hypercall functions are used _only_ within the kernel, but vmware_hypercall are also used by modules.
>Exporting __tdx_hypercall function is an original Dave's concern.
>So we ended up with exporting wrapper, not generic, but VMware specific with added checks against arbitrary use.
>vmware_tdx_hypercall is not designed for !X86_HYPER_VMWARE callers. But such a calls are not forbidden.
>Arguments in a structure is an API for __tdx_hypercall(). Input and output argument handling are done by vmware_hypercall callers, while VMware specific dress up is inside the wrapper.
>
>Peter, do you think code comments are required to make it clear for the reader?
>
>

TBH that explanation didn't make much sense to me...