[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d31a52fc-9073-483d-b84b-1f02a5698a89@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 18:47:32 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: Add gcc_parents_0_ao support
On 1/23/24 17:34, Satya Priya Kakitapalli wrote:
> Add active_only support for gcc_parents_0, this is needed because
> some of the clocks under it are critical which would vote on xo
> blocking the suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>
> ---
Is there a need to keep gcc_cpuss_ahb_clk_src around? Do we do any
ratesetting on it? Should we ever turn it off?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists