| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 02:45:50 +0800
From: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm, lru_gen: try to prefetch next page when scanning LRU
From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
Prefetch for inactive/active LRU have been long exiting, apply the same
optimization for MGLRU.
Test 1: Ramdisk fio ro test in a 4G memcg on a EPYC 7K62:
fio -name=mglru --numjobs=16 --directory=/mnt --size=960m \
--buffered=1 --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=128 \
--iodepth_batch_submit=32 --iodepth_batch_complete=32 \
--rw=randread --random_distribution=zipf:0.5 --norandommap \
--time_based --ramp_time=1m --runtime=6m --group_reporting
Before this patch:
bw ( MiB/s): min= 7758, max= 9239, per=100.00%, avg=8747.59, stdev=16.51, samples=11488
iops : min=1986251, max=2365323, avg=2239380.87, stdev=4225.93, samples=11488
After this patch (+7.2%):
bw ( MiB/s): min= 8360, max= 9771, per=100.00%, avg=9381.31, stdev=15.67, samples=11488
iops : min=2140296, max=2501385, avg=2401613.91, stdev=4010.41, samples=11488
Test 2: Ramdisk fio hybrid test for 30m in a 4G memcg on a EPYC 7K62 (3 times):
fio --buffered=1 --numjobs=8 --size=960m --directory=/mnt \
--time_based --ramp_time=1m --runtime=30m \
--ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=128 --iodepth_batch_submit=32 \
--iodepth_batch_complete=32 --norandommap \
--name=mglru-ro --rw=randread --random_distribution=zipf:0.7 \
--name=mglru-rw --rw=randrw --random_distribution=zipf:0.7
Before this patch:
READ: 6622.0 MiB/s. Stdev: 22.090722
WRITE: 1256.3 MiB/s. Stdev: 5.249339
After this patch (+4.6%, +3.3%):
READ: 6926.6 MiB/s, Stdev: 37.950260
WRITE: 1297.3 MiB/s, Stdev: 7.408704
Test 3: 30m of MySQL test in 6G memcg (12 times):
echo 'set GLOBAL innodb_buffer_pool_size=16106127360;' | \
mysql -u USER -h localhost --password=PASS
sysbench /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua \
--mysql-user=USER --mysql-password=PASS --mysql-db=DB \
--tables=48 --table-size=2000000 --threads=16 --time=1800 run
Before this patch
Avg: 134743.714545 qps. Stdev: 582.242189
After this patch (+0.2%):
Avg: 135005.779091 qps. Stdev: 295.299027
Test 4: Build linux kernel in 2G memcg with make -j48 with SSD swap
(for memory stress, 18 times):
Before this patch:
Avg: 1456.768899 s. Stdev: 20.106973
After this patch (+0.0%):
Avg: 1455.659254 s. Stdev: 15.274481
Test 5: Memtier test in a 4G cgroup using brd as swap (18 times):
memcached -u nobody -m 16384 -s /tmp/memcached.socket \
-a 0766 -t 16 -B binary &
memtier_benchmark -S /tmp/memcached.socket \
-P memcache_binary -n allkeys \
--key-minimum=1 --key-maximum=16000000 -d 1024 \
--ratio=1:0 --key-pattern=P:P -c 1 -t 16 --pipeline 8 -x 3
Before this patch:
Avg: 50317.984000 Ops/sec. Stdev: 2568.965458
After this patch (-5.7%):
Avg: 47691.343500 Ops/sec. Stdev: 3925.772473
It seems prefetch is helpful in most cases, but the memtier test is
either hitting a case where prefetch causes higher cache miss or it's
just too noisy (high stdev).
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 4f9c854ce6cc..03631cedb3ab 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3681,15 +3681,26 @@ static bool inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, bool can_swap)
/* prevent cold/hot inversion if force_scan is true */
for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[old_gen][type][zone];
+ struct folio *prev = NULL;
- while (!list_empty(head)) {
- struct folio *folio = lru_to_folio(head);
+ if (!list_empty(head))
+ prev = lru_to_folio(head);
+
+ while (prev) {
+ struct folio *folio = prev;
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_active(folio), folio);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_is_file_lru(folio) != type, folio);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_zonenum(folio) != zone, folio);
+ if (unlikely(list_is_first(&folio->lru, head))) {
+ prev = NULL;
+ } else {
+ prev = lru_to_folio(&folio->lru);
+ prefetchw(&prev->flags);
+ }
+
new_gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, false);
list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[new_gen][type][zone]);
@@ -4341,11 +4352,15 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
for (i = MAX_NR_ZONES; i > 0; i--) {
LIST_HEAD(moved);
int skipped_zone = 0;
+ struct folio *prev = NULL;
int zone = (sc->reclaim_idx + i) % MAX_NR_ZONES;
struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone];
- while (!list_empty(head)) {
- struct folio *folio = lru_to_folio(head);
+ if (!list_empty(head))
+ prev = lru_to_folio(head);
+
+ while (prev) {
+ struct folio *folio = prev;
int delta = folio_nr_pages(folio);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_unevictable(folio), folio);
@@ -4355,6 +4370,13 @@ static int scan_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,
scanned += delta;
+ if (unlikely(list_is_first(&folio->lru, head))) {
+ prev = NULL;
+ } else {
+ prev = lru_to_folio(&folio->lru);
+ prefetchw(&prev->flags);
+ }
+
if (sort_folio(lruvec, folio, sc, tier))
sorted += delta;
else if (isolate_folio(lruvec, folio, sc)) {
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists