[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kmijvv53j67l6lgndgrybj6iaup6pyrvzklkre6th4rcnrsrqo@ie5ji4nutbcd>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 23:28:31 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
andre.draszik@...aro.org, peter.griffin@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, willmcvicker@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] spi: s3c64xx: explicitly include <linux/bits.h>
Hi Tudor,
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 03:34:04PM +0000, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> The driver uses GENMASK() but does not include <linux/bits.h>.
> Include the missing header, we shall aim to have the drivers self
> contained.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> index b350e70fd179..9ce56aa792ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> // Copyright (c) 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> // Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@...sung.com>
>
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
I don't see why this should be included. Are there cases when
not having bits.h produces any compilation error?
Andi
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> --
> 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists