[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240122193453.6096d45f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:34:53 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference at
ttm_device_init+0xb4
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:29:41 -0500
"Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@....com> wrote:
>
> In one of my previous revisions of this patch when I was experimenting,
> I used something like below. Wonder if that could work in your case
> and/or in general.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>
> index 43e27ab77f95..4c3902b94be4 100644
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>
> bool use_dma_alloc, bool use_dma32){
>
> struct ttm_global *glob = &ttm_glob;
>
> +bool node_has_cpu = false;
>
> int ret;
>
> if (WARN_ON(vma_manager == NULL))
>
> @@ -213,7 +214,12 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>
> bdev->funcs = funcs;
>
> ttm_sys_man_init(bdev);
>
> -ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>
> +
>
> +node_has_cpu = node_state(dev->numa_node, N_CPU);
Considering that qxl_ttm_init() passes in dev = NULL, the above would blow
up just the same.
-- Steve
>
> +if (node_has_cpu)
>
> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev->numa_node, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>
> +else
>
> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc,
>
> +use_dma32);
>
> bdev->vma_manager = vma_manager;
>
> spin_lock_init(&bdev->lru_lock);
>
>
> >
> > -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists