linux-kernel - [PATCH 46/82] crypto: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240123002814.1396804-46-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:27:21 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 46/82] crypto: Refactor intentional wrap-around test

In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:

	VAR + value < VAR

Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow
option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we
want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully
instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they
are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3],
or pointer[4] types.

Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow().
This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future.

Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4]
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 crypto/adiantum.c                   | 2 +-
 drivers/crypto/amcc/crypto4xx_alg.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/adiantum.c b/crypto/adiantum.c
index 60f3883b736a..c2f62ca455af 100644
--- a/crypto/adiantum.c
+++ b/crypto/adiantum.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static inline void le128_add(le128 *r, const le128 *v1, const le128 *v2)
 
 	r->b = cpu_to_le64(x + y);
 	r->a = cpu_to_le64(le64_to_cpu(v1->a) + le64_to_cpu(v2->a) +
-			   (x + y < x));
+			   (add_would_overflow(x, y)));
 }
 
 /* Subtraction in Z/(2^{128}Z) */
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/amcc/crypto4xx_alg.c b/drivers/crypto/amcc/crypto4xx_alg.c
index e0af611a95d8..33f73234ddd9 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/amcc/crypto4xx_alg.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/amcc/crypto4xx_alg.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ crypto4xx_ctr_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
 	 * the whole IV is a counter.  So fallback if the counter is going to
 	 * overlow.
 	 */
-	if (counter + nblks < counter) {
+	if (add_would_overflow(counter, nblks)) {
 		SYNC_SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(subreq, ctx->sw_cipher.cipher);
 		int ret;
 
-- 
2.34.1